[293] Bhikkhus, in whatever bhikkhu or bhikkhunī, with regard to forms cognizable by the eye, whatever lust (rāga) there is exists not, whatever hatred there is exists not, whatever delusion there is exists not; whatever lust there is has been abandoned, whatever hatred there is has been abandoned, whatever delusion there is has been abandoned — even if forms cognizable by the eye of overwhelming intensity come into the range of the eye, they do not overpower that one's mind (citta). What need is there to speak of feeble ones? For what reason is that? Because, bhikkhus, whatever lust there is exists not, whatever hatred there is exists not, whatever delusion there is exists not; whatever lust there is has been abandoned, whatever hatred there is has been abandoned, whatever delusion there is has been abandoned. …
Bhikkhus, in whatever bhikkhu or bhikkhunī, with regard to tastes cognizable by the tongue … with regard to dhammas cognizable by the mind, whatever lust there is exists not, whatever hatred there is exists not, whatever delusion there is exists not; whatever lust there is has been abandoned, whatever hatred there is has been abandoned, whatever delusion there is has been abandoned — even if dhammas cognizable by the mind of overwhelming intensity come into the range of the mind, they do not overpower that one's mind. What need is there to speak of feeble ones? For what reason is that? Because, bhikkhus, whatever lust there is exists not, whatever hatred there is exists not, whatever delusion there is exists not; whatever lust there is has been abandoned, whatever hatred there is has been abandoned, whatever delusion there is has been abandoned.
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.