[132] How is there difference (nānatta) in the directing (abhinīhāra) of the mind (citta) to equanimity toward formations (saṅkhārupekkhā) on the part of the trainee (sekkha) and of one devoid of lust (vītarāga)?
The trainee either delights in equanimity toward formations, or sees it with insight, or, having reflected, enters upon the attainment of fruition (phalasamāpatti). One devoid of lust either sees equanimity toward formations with insight, or, having reflected, enters upon the attainment of fruition; or, having looked on at it with equanimity, he dwells in the dwelling of emptiness (suññatavihāra), the dwelling of the signless (animittavihāra), or the dwelling of the desireless (appaṇihitavihāra). Thus there is difference in the directing of the mind to equanimity toward formations on the part of the trainee and of one devoid of lust, in the sense of dwelling and attainment (vihārasamāpatti).
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.