[507] For one attending as impermanent, what appears as fearful? For one attending as suffering (dukkha), what appears as fearful? For one attending as not-self, what appears as fearful?
For one attending as impermanent, the sign (nimitta) appears as fearful; for one attending as suffering, occurrence (pavatta) appears as fearful; for one attending as not-self, both the sign and occurrence appear as fearful.
The wisdom in the appearance as fearful (bhayatupaṭṭhāne paññā), the knowledge (ñāṇa) of danger (ādīnava), and disenchantment (nibbidā) — are these dhammas different in meaning and different in phrasing, or are they one in meaning, differing only in phrasing? The wisdom in the appearance as fearful, the knowledge of danger, and disenchantment — these dhammas are one in meaning, differing only in phrasing.
Contemplation of not-self (anattānupassanā) and contemplation of emptiness (suññatānupassanā) — are these dhammas different in meaning and different in phrasing, or are they one in meaning, differing only in phrasing? Contemplation of not-self and contemplation of emptiness — these dhammas are one in meaning, differing only in phrasing.
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.