[1063] Are these dhammas—settlement in the presence (sammukhāvinaya) and the verdict of mindfulness (sativinaya)—different in meaning and different in phrasing, or are they one in meaning, differing only in phrasing? Settlement in the presence and the verdict of past insanity (amūḷhavinaya) … settlement in the presence and acting upon acknowledgment (paṭiññātakaraṇa); settlement in the presence and the decision of the majority (yebhuyyasikā); settlement in the presence and the verdict of aggravated misconduct (tassapāpiyasikā); settlement in the presence and the covering over with grass (tiṇavatthāraka)—are these dhammas different in meaning and different in phrasing, or are they one in meaning, differing only in phrasing?
Settlement in the presence and the verdict of mindfulness—these dhammas are both different in meaning and different in phrasing. Settlement in the presence and the verdict of past insanity … settlement in the presence and acting upon acknowledgment; settlement in the presence and the decision of the majority; settlement in the presence and the verdict of aggravated misconduct; settlement in the presence and the covering over with grass—these dhammas are both different in meaning and different in phrasing.
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.