[126] "But how, venerable sir, does identity view (sakkāyadiṭṭhi) not come to be?"
"Here, bhikkhu, a learned noble disciple — one who has seen the noble ones, is skilled in the Dhamma of the noble ones, is well trained in the Dhamma of the noble ones; who has seen true persons (sappurisa), is skilled in the Dhamma of true persons, is well trained in the Dhamma of true persons — does not regard form as self, nor self as possessing form, nor form as in self, nor self as in form; he does not regard feeling (vedanā) as self, nor self as possessing feeling, nor feeling as in self, nor self as in feeling; he does not regard perception as self, nor self as possessing perception, nor perception as in self, nor self as in perception; he does not regard volitional formations as self, nor self as possessing volitional formations, nor volitional formations as in self, nor self as in volitional formations; he does not regard consciousness as self, nor self as possessing consciousness, nor consciousness as in self, nor self as in consciousness. In this way, bhikkhu, identity view does not come to be."
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.