[185] How is wisdom as direct knowledge (abhiññāpaññā) knowledge (ñāṇa) in the sense of what is known (ñātaṭṭha)? Wisdom as full understanding (pariññāpaññā) is knowledge in the sense of judging (tīraṇaṭṭha); wisdom as abandoning (pahānapaññā) is knowledge in the sense of relinquishing (pariccāgaṭṭha); wisdom as development (bhāvanāpaññā) is knowledge in the sense of single function (ekarasaṭṭha); wisdom as realization (sacchikiriyāpaññā) is knowledge in the sense of contact (phassanaṭṭha).
Whatever dhammas are directly known, those dhammas are known; whatever dhammas are fully understood, those dhammas are judged; whatever dhammas are abandoned, those dhammas are relinquished; whatever dhammas are developed, those dhammas are of single function; whatever dhammas are realized, those dhammas are contacted.
That is knowledge (ñāṇa) in the sense of knowing that; it is wisdom in the sense of understanding. Therefore it is said: wisdom as direct knowledge is knowledge in the sense of what is known; wisdom as full understanding is knowledge in the sense of judging; wisdom as abandoning is knowledge in the sense of relinquishing; wisdom as development is knowledge in the sense of single function; wisdom as realization is knowledge in the sense of contact.
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.