[1068] P. Is it not to be said: "Knowledge of the ways of another's mind (cetopariyāya-ñāṇa) has only mind (citta) as its object, and not anything else as its object"?
S. Yes.
P. But is it not knowledge of the ways of another's mind?
S. Yes.
P. If it is knowledge of the ways of another's mind, then indeed, good sir, you should say: "Knowledge of the ways of another's mind has only mind as its object, and not anything else as its object."
The Discussion of Having Mind as Object (Cittārammaṇakathā) is concluded.
__________
Discussion of Knowledge of the Future (Anāgatañāṇakathā)
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.