[1075]
Sakavādin: Does a disciple (sāvaka) have knowledge (ñāṇa) of fruition (phala)?
Paravādin: Yes.
S.: Does a disciple declare the specific quality of fruition (phalassakata)?
P.: It should not be said thus. …
S.: Does a disciple have knowledge of fruition?
P.: Yes.
S.: Does a disciple possess [knowledge of] the superiority and inferiority of fruition (phalaparopariyatta), the superiority and inferiority of the faculties (indriyaparopariyatta), the superiority and inferiority of persons (puggalaparopariyatta)?
P.: It should not be said thus. …
S.: Does a disciple have knowledge of fruition?
P.: Yes.
S.: Does a disciple possess the designation of the aggregates (khandhapaññatti), the designation of the sense bases (āyatanapaññatti), the designation of the elements (dhātupaññatti), the designation of the truths (saccapaññatti), the designation of the faculties (indriyapaññatti), the designation of persons (puggalapaññatti)?
P.: It should not be said thus. …
S.: Does a disciple have knowledge of fruition?
P.: Yes.
S.: Is a disciple the Conqueror (jina), the Teacher (satthā), the Fully Self-Enlightened One (sammāsambuddha), the All-Knowing One (sabbaññū), the All-Seeing One (sabbadassāvī), the Master of the Dhamma (dhammasāmī), the Resort of the Dhamma (dhammapaṭisaraṇa)?
P.: It should not be said thus. …
S.: Does a disciple have knowledge of fruition?
P.: Yes.
S.: Is a disciple the arouser of the unarisen path (magga), the producer of the unproduced path, the declarer of the undeclared path, the knower of the path, the understander of the path, the one skilled in the path?
P.: It should not be said thus. …
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.