[1450] [Paravādin:] When lust (rāga) has departed, should one be said to be "free from lust" (vītarāga)?
[Sakavādin:] Yes.
[Paravādin:] When non-knowledge (aññāṇa) has departed, while a mind (citta) dissociated from knowledge (ñāṇa) is occurring, should one be said to be "one who has knowledge" (ñāṇī)?
[Sakavādin:] It should not be said thus. …
[Paravādin:] When hatred (dosa) has departed … when delusion (moha) has departed … when defilement (kilesa) has departed, should one be said to be "free from defilement" (nikkilesa)?
[Sakavādin:] Yes.
[Paravādin:] When non-knowledge has departed, while a mind dissociated from knowledge is occurring, should one be said to be "one who has knowledge"?
[Sakavādin:] It should not be said thus. …
[Sakavādin:] When non-knowledge has departed, while a mind dissociated from knowledge is occurring, should one be said to be "one who has knowledge"?
[Paravādin:] Yes.
[Sakavādin:] Is one "one who has knowledge" by past knowledge — "one who has knowledge" by knowledge that has ceased, departed, subsided?
[Paravādin:] It should not be said thus. …
Discussion of Knowledge (Ñāṇakathā).
____________
Discussion: "Knowledge Is Dissociated from Mind" (Ñāṇaṃ cittavippayuttantikathā)
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.