[1512] Paravādin: Is it not to be said that the person bound to a seventh existence at most (sattamabhavika) has abandoned the bad destination (duggati)?
Sakavādin: Yes (āmantā).
Sakavādin: Could the person bound to a seventh existence at most be reborn in hell (niraya), be reborn in the animal kingdom (tiracchānayoni), be reborn in the realm of hungry ghosts (pittivisaya)?
Paravādin: It should not be said thus. …
Sakavādin: In that case, the person bound to a seventh existence at most has indeed abandoned the bad destination.
The Discussion of the Person Bound to a Seventh Existence at Most (Sattamabhavikakathā) is concluded.
The Twelfth Chapter (dvādasamo vaggo) is concluded.
Its summary (uddāna):
Restraint (saṃvara) is action (kamma), and likewise non-restraint (asaṃvara);
all action is with result (savipāka); sound (sadda) is a result (vipāka);
the six sense bases (saḷāyatana) are a result;
the seven-times-at-most person (sattakkhattuparama) is fixed in the seven-times-at-most state (sattakkhattuparamatāniyata);
the clan-to-clan person (kolaṃkola) is fixed in the clan-to-clan state;
the one-seeder person (ekabījī) is fixed in the one-seeder state;
the person accomplished in view (diṭṭhisampanna) might intentionally deprive a living being of life;
the person accomplished in view has abandoned the bad destination;
and likewise the person bound to a seventh existence at most.
________________________
The Discussion of One Who Remains for the Aeon (Kappaṭṭhakathā)
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.