[856] S. Should it not be said: "Perception (saññā) exists in the sphere of neither perception nor non-perception (nevasaññānāsaññāyatana), and that is a percipient existence (saññabhava), a percipient destination (saññagati) … an acquisition of percipient individuality (saññattabhāvapaṭilābha)"?
P. Yes.
S. Should it not be said: "Perception exists among non-percipient beings (asaññasattā), and that is a percipient existence, a percipient destination … an acquisition of percipient individuality"?
P. It should not be said thus. …
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.