[96]
S. Is the designation (paññatti) of the person (puggala) made in dependence on feeling (vedanā)?
P. Yes.
S. Is the designation of an indeterminate (abyākata) person made in dependence on indeterminate feeling?
P. It should not be said thus. …
S. Is the designation of an indeterminate person made in dependence on indeterminate feeling?
P. Yes.
S. Is indeterminate feeling impermanent, conditioned (saṅkhata), dependently arisen (paṭiccasamuppanna), subject to destruction, subject to passing away, subject to fading away, subject to cessation, subject to change?
P. Yes.
S. Is the indeterminate person, too, impermanent, conditioned, dependently arisen, subject to destruction, subject to passing away, subject to fading away, subject to cessation, subject to change?
P. It should not be said thus. …
S. Is the designation of the person made in dependence on perception (saññā)? … in dependence on volitional formations (saṅkhārā)? … in dependence on consciousness (viññāṇa)?
P. Yes.
S. Is the designation of a wholesome (kusala) person made in dependence on wholesome consciousness?
P. It should not be said thus. …
S. Is the designation of a wholesome person made in dependence on wholesome consciousness?
P. Yes.
S. Does wholesome consciousness have fruit, have result (vipāka), have desirable fruit, have agreeable fruit, have pleasing fruit, have fruit delightful in itself (asecanaka), yield happiness, ripen in happiness?
P. Yes.
S. Does the wholesome person, too, have fruit, have result, have desirable fruit, have agreeable fruit, have pleasing fruit, have fruit delightful in itself, yield happiness, ripen in happiness?
P. It should not be said thus. …
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.