[590] Now at that time bhikkhunīs suspended the Uposatha (uposatha) against bhikkhus, suspended the Pavāraṇā (pavāraṇā), made them answerable to formal summons (savacanīya), initiated censure (anuvāda), had them grant leave (okāsa), accused them, and reminded them … They reported this matter to the Blessed One … "Bhikkhus, the Uposatha is not to be suspended by a bhikkhunī against a bhikkhu; even if suspended, it is not suspended; for the one who suspends it, there is an offence (āpatti) of wrong-doing (dukkaṭa).
The Pavāraṇā is not to be suspended; even if suspended, it is not suspended; for the one who suspends it, there is an offence of wrong-doing.
A formal summons is not to be made; even if made, it is not made; for the one who makes it, there is an offence of wrong-doing.
Censure is not to be initiated; even if initiated, it is not initiated; for the one who initiates it, there is an offence of wrong-doing.
Leave is not to be caused to be granted; even if caused to be granted, it is not granted; for the one who has it granted, there is an offence of wrong-doing.
He is not to be accused; even if accused, he is not accused; for the one who accuses, there is an offence of wrong-doing.
He is not to be reminded; even if reminded, he is not reminded; for the one who reminds, there is an offence of wrong-doing."
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.