[372] Bhikkhus, suppose they were to strike a man with a dart, but would not strike him with a second dart following upon it. In that case, bhikkhus, that man would feel a feeling (vedanā) from one dart only. Even so, bhikkhus, when the instructed noble disciple is touched by a painful feeling, he does not sorrow, does not grow weary, does not lament, does not beat his breast and wail, does not fall into confusion. He feels one feeling only — a bodily one, not a mental one. Moreover, he harbors no aversion toward that same painful feeling; since he harbors no aversion toward that painful feeling, the underlying tendency (anusaya) to aversion in regard to painful feeling does not lie latent in him. Touched by painful feeling, he does not delight in sensual pleasure. For what reason? Because, bhikkhus, the instructed noble disciple understands an escape from painful feeling other than sensual pleasure. Since he does not delight in sensual pleasure, the underlying tendency to lust in regard to pleasant feeling does not lie latent in him. He understands as it really is the origin and the passing away, the gratification, the danger, and the escape in regard to those feelings. Since he understands as it really is the origin and the passing away, the gratification, the danger, and the escape in regard to those feelings, the underlying tendency to ignorance in regard to neither-painful-nor-pleasant feeling does not lie latent in him. If he feels a pleasant feeling, he feels it detached; if he feels a painful feeling, he feels it detached; if he feels a neither-painful-nor-pleasant feeling, he feels it detached. This, bhikkhus, is called an instructed noble disciple who is detached from birth, aging, death, from sorrow, lamentation, pain, grief, and despair — he is detached from suffering (dukkha), I say. This, bhikkhus, is the distinction, this is the disparity, this is the difference between the instructed noble disciple and the uninstructed worldling.
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.