[278] **That by which they might speak of him — that does not exist for him**: by whatever lust (rāga) they would speak of him, by whatever hatred, by whatever delusion, by whatever conceit (māna), by whatever view (diṭṭhi), by whatever restlessness (uddhacca), by whatever doubt (vicikicchā), by whatever latent tendencies (anusaya) they would speak of him — saying "he is lustful," or "he is hating," or "he is deluded," or "he is bound," or "he is attached," or "he has gone to distraction," or "he has not come to a conclusion," or "he has gone to strength [of tendency]" — those volitional formations (abhisaṅkhāra) have been abandoned. Because the volitional formations have been abandoned, by whatever destination (gati) they would speak of him — saying "a hell-being," or "one born in the animal womb," or "one belonging to the realm of hungry ghosts," or "a human," or "a deva," or "one having form," or "formless," or "percipient," or "non-percipient," or "neither percipient nor non-percipient" — for him there exists no cause, there exists no condition, there exists no reason by which they might speak of him, might talk of him, might designate him. Hence, **that by which they might speak of him — that does not exist for him**.
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.