[1795]
S. Would annihilationism (uccheda-diṭṭhi) not arise for a person (puggala) fixed [in destiny] by eternalism (sassata-diṭṭhi)?
P. Yes.
S. Is it abandoned?
P. It should not be said thus. …
S. Is it abandoned?
P. Yes.
S. Is it abandoned by the Path of Stream-Entry (sotāpatti-magga)?
P. It should not be said thus. …
S. Is it abandoned by the Path of Once-Returning (sakadāgāmi-magga) … by the Path of Non-Returning (anāgāmi-magga) … by the Path of Arahantship (arahatta-magga)?
P. It should not be said thus. …
S. By which path?
P. By an unwholesome (akusala) path.
S. An unwholesome path … Then indeed, sir, it should not be said that for a person fixed [in destiny] by eternalism, annihilationism is abandoned by an unwholesome path.
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.