[1797] S. For a person (puggala) fixed (niyata) by annihilationism (uccheda-diṭṭhi), eternalism (sassata-diṭṭhi) would not arise?
P. Yes.
S. Is it abandoned?
P. It should not be said so. …
S. Is it abandoned?
P. Yes.
S. By the path of stream-entry (sotāpatti-magga)?
P. It should not be said so. …
S. By the path of once-returning (sakadāgāmi-magga) … by the path of arahantship (arahatta-magga)?
P. It should not be said so. …
S. By which path?
P. By an unwholesome (akusala) path.
S. An unwholesome path … Then indeed it should not be said that the eternalism of a person fixed by annihilationism is abandoned by an unwholesome path.
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.