[211] "Does the Non-Returner (anāgāmī) fall away from the fruition of Non-Returning (anāgāmiphala)?" — "Yes."
"Does the Once-Returner (sakadāgāmī) fall away from the fruition of Once-Returning (sakadāgāmiphala)?" — "It should not be said thus."
"Whose development (bhāvanā) of the path (magga) … development of the factors of awakening (bojjhaṅga) is superior: the Non-Returner's or the Once-Returner's?" — "The Non-Returner's."
"If the Non-Returner's development of the factors of awakening is superior, and the Non-Returner falls away from the fruition of Non-Returning, then indeed, sir, it should be said: the Once-Returner falls away from the fruition of Once-Returning."
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.