[726] Sakavādin: Is the power of a Tathāgata (Tathāgatabala) — the knowledge (ñāṇa) as it really is (yathābhūta) regarding the passing away and rebirth (cutūpapāta) of beings — noble (ariya)?
Paravādin: Yes.
Sakavādin: Does it have emptiness (suññatā) as its object (ārammaṇa)?
Paravādin: It should not be said thus. …
Sakavādin: Does it have emptiness as its object?
Paravādin: Yes.
Sakavādin: Does he attend to the passing away and rebirth of beings and attend to emptiness?
Paravādin: It should not be said thus. …
Sakavādin: Does he attend to the passing away and rebirth of beings and attend to emptiness?
Paravādin: Yes.
Sakavādin: Is there a combination of two contacts (phassa), of two minds (citta)?
Paravādin: It should not be said thus. …
Sakavādin: Is the power of a Tathāgata — the knowledge as it really is regarding the passing away and rebirth of beings — noble?
Paravādin: Yes.
Sakavādin: Does it have the signless (animitta) as its object? … Does it have the undirected (appaṇihita) as its object?
Paravādin: It should not be said thus. …
Sakavādin: Does it have the undirected as its object?
Paravādin: Yes.
Sakavādin: Does he attend to the passing away and rebirth of beings and attend to the undirected?
Paravādin: It should not be said thus. …
Sakavādin: Does he attend to the passing away and rebirth of beings and attend to the undirected?
Paravādin: Yes.
Sakavādin: Is there a combination of two contacts, of two minds?
Paravādin: It should not be said thus. …
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.