[853] S: Is it not a percipient existence (saññabhava), a percipient destination (saññagati), an abode of percipient beings (saññasattāvāsa), a percipient round of rebirths (saññasaṃsāra), a percipient mode of generation (saññayoni), an acquisition of percipient individuality (saññattabhāvapaṭilābha)?
P: Yes.
S: If it is a percipient existence, a percipient destination, … an acquisition of percipient individuality, then indeed you should not say: "It should not be said that perception (saññā) exists in the sphere of neither perception nor non-perception (nevasaññānāsaññāyatana)."
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.