[854] S. In the sphere of neither perception nor non-perception (nevasaññānāsaññāyatana), should it not be said that perception (saññā) exists?
P. Yes.
S. Is it a one-constituent existence (ekavokārabhava), a destination (gati), … an acquisition of individuality (attabhāvapaṭilābha)?
P. It should not be said thus. …
S. Is it not a four-constituent existence (catuvokārabhava), a destination, … an acquisition of individuality?
P. Yes.
S. If it is a four-constituent existence, a destination, … an acquisition of individuality, then indeed you should not say: "In the sphere of neither perception nor non-perception it should not be said that perception exists."
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.