[92] Sakavādī: Is there a designation (paññatti) of the person (puggala) in dependence on (upādāya) form (rūpa)?
Paravādī: Yes.
Sakavādī: Is form impermanent (anicca), conditioned (saṅkhata), dependently arisen (paṭiccasamuppanna), subject to destruction (khaya-dhamma), subject to vanishing (vaya-dhamma), subject to fading away (virāga-dhamma), subject to cessation (nirodha-dhamma), subject to change (vipariṇāma-dhamma)?
Paravādī: Yes.
Sakavādī: Is the person also impermanent, conditioned, dependently arisen, subject to destruction, subject to vanishing, subject to fading away, subject to cessation, subject to change?
Paravādī: It should not be said thus. …
Sakavādī: In dependence on feeling (vedanā) … in dependence on perception (saññā) … in dependence on volitional formations (saṅkhārā) … is there a designation of the person in dependence on consciousness (viññāṇa)?
Paravādī: Yes.
Sakavādī: Is consciousness impermanent, conditioned, dependently arisen, subject to destruction, subject to vanishing, subject to fading away, subject to cessation, subject to change?
Paravādī: Yes.
Sakavādī: Is the person also impermanent, conditioned, dependently arisen, subject to destruction, subject to vanishing, subject to fading away, subject to cessation, subject to change?
Paravādī: It should not be said thus. …
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.