[1470] From wherever one does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust (kāmarāgānusaya) and the latent tendency of repulsion (paṭighānusaya), does one not fully understand the latent tendency of conceit (mānānusaya) from there?
In the form element (rūpadhātu) and in the formless element (arūpadhātu) — from there one does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion, but it is not the case that from there one does not fully understand the latent tendency of conceit; in the unincluded (apariyāpanna) — from there one does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion, and one does not fully understand the latent tendency of conceit.
Or rather, from wherever one does not fully understand the latent tendency of conceit, does one not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion from there?
In painful feeling (dukkhā vedanā) — from there one does not fully understand the latent tendency of conceit and the latent tendency of sensual lust, but it is not the case that from there one does not fully understand the latent tendency of repulsion; in the unincluded — from there one does not fully understand the latent tendency of conceit, and one does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion.
From wherever one does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion, does one not fully understand the latent tendency of view (diṭṭhānusaya) … the latent tendency of doubt (vicikicchānusaya) from there?
In the form element and in the formless element — from there one does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion, but it is not the case that from there one does not fully understand the latent tendency of doubt; in the unincluded — from there one does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion, and one does not fully understand the latent tendency of doubt.
Or rather, from wherever one does not fully understand the latent tendency of doubt, does one not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion from there?
Yes.
From wherever one does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion, does one not fully understand the latent tendency of lust for existence (bhavarāgānusaya) from there?
In the form element and in the formless element — from there one does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion, but it is not the case that from there one does not fully understand the latent tendency of lust for existence; in the unincluded — from there one does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion, and one does not fully understand the latent tendency of lust for existence.
Or rather, from wherever one does not fully understand the latent tendency of lust for existence, does one not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion from there?
In painful feeling — from there one does not fully understand the latent tendency of lust for existence and the latent tendency of sensual lust, but it is not the case that from there one does not fully understand the latent tendency of repulsion; in the two feelings of the sense-sphere element (kāmadhātu) — from there one does not fully understand the latent tendency of lust for existence and the latent tendency of repulsion, but it is not the case that from there one does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust; in the unincluded — from there one does not fully understand the latent tendency of lust for existence, and one does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion.
From wherever one does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion, does one not fully understand the latent tendency of ignorance (avijjānusaya) from there?
In the form element and in the formless element — from there one does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion, but it is not the case that from there one does not fully understand the latent tendency of ignorance; in the unincluded — from there one does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion, and one does not fully understand the latent tendency of ignorance.
Or rather, from wherever one does not fully understand the latent tendency of ignorance, does one not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion from there?
Yes.
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.