[50] Could it be that, in dependence on a wholesome phenomenon (kusala dhamma), a wholesome phenomenon might arise by root condition (hetu-paccaya), by object condition (ārammaṇa-paccaya), not by predominance condition (adhipati-paccaya)?
By root condition, by object condition, not by immediacy condition (anantara-paccaya)? …
By root condition, by object condition, not by non-disappearance condition (avigata-paccaya)?
By root condition, by object condition, by predominance condition, not by immediacy condition?
By root condition, by object condition, by predominance condition, not by non-disappearance condition?
By root condition, by object condition, by predominance condition, by immediacy condition, not by contiguity condition (samanantara-paccaya)?
By root condition, by object condition, by predominance condition, by immediacy condition, not by non-disappearance condition?
By root condition, by object condition, by predominance condition, by immediacy condition, by contiguity condition … by connascence condition (sahajāta-paccaya), by mutuality condition (aññamañña-paccaya), by dependence condition (nissaya-paccaya), by decisive-support condition (upanissaya-paccaya), by prenascence condition (purejāta-paccaya), by postnascence condition (pacchājāta-paccaya), by repetition condition (āsevana-paccaya), by kamma condition (kamma-paccaya), by kamma-result condition (vipāka-paccaya), by nutriment condition (āhāra-paccaya), by faculty condition (indriya-paccaya), by absorption condition (jhāna-paccaya), by path condition (magga-paccaya), by association condition (sampayutta-paccaya), by dissociation condition (vippayutta-paccaya), by presence condition (atthi-paccaya), by absence condition (natthi-paccaya), by disappearance condition (vigata-paccaya) … not by non-disappearance condition?
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.