[51] Could it be that, dependent on a wholesome phenomenon (dhamma), a wholesome phenomenon might arise by object condition (ārammaṇa-paccaya), by predominance condition (adhipati-paccaya), by immediacy condition (anantara-paccaya) … by non-disappearance condition (avigata-paccaya), not by root condition (hetu-paccaya)?
By non-disappearance condition, not by object condition … by non-disappearance condition, not by disappearance condition (vigata-paccaya)?
By non-disappearance condition, by root condition, not by object condition; by non-disappearance condition, by root condition, not by disappearance condition?
By non-disappearance condition, by root condition, by object condition, not by predominance condition; by non-disappearance condition, by root condition, by object condition, not by disappearance condition?
By non-disappearance condition, by root condition, by object condition, by predominance condition, by immediacy condition, by contiguity condition (samanantara-paccaya), by connascence condition (sahajāta-paccaya) … not by disappearance condition?
The triad (tika) — the noble Paṭṭhāna — and the supreme dyad (duka),
the dyad-triad (duka-tika) and the triad-dyad (tika-duka),
the triad-triad (tika-tika) and the dyad-dyad (duka-duka):
six methods in the positive-negative (anuloma-paccanīya), exceedingly profound.
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.