[1073] Sakavādin: Is there knowledge (ñāṇa) of the present?
Paravādin: Yes.
S.: Does one know that knowledge with that knowledge?
P.: It should not be said thus. …
S.: Does one know that knowledge with that knowledge?
P.: Yes.
S.: Does one know that knowledge as "knowledge" with that knowledge?
P.: It should not be said thus. …
S.: Does one know that knowledge as "knowledge" with that knowledge?
P.: Yes.
S.: Is that knowledge the object (ārammaṇa) of that knowledge?
P.: It should not be said thus. …
S.: Is that knowledge the object of that knowledge?
P.: Yes.
S.: Does one touch that contact (phassa) with that contact, feel that feeling (vedanā) with that feeling, perceive that perception (saññā) with that perception, will that volition (cetanā) with that volition, think that mind (citta) with that mind, think that thought (vitakka) with that thought, examine that examination (vicāra) with that examination, cherish that rapture (pīti) with that rapture, recollect that mindfulness (sati) with that mindfulness, understand that wisdom (paññā) with that wisdom, cut that sword with that sword, hew that axe with that axe, hew that hatchet with that hatchet, hew that adze with that adze, sew that needle with that needle, stroke that fingertip with that fingertip, stroke that nose-tip with that nose-tip, stroke that crown of the head with that crown of the head, wash that excrement with that excrement, wash that urine with that urine, wash that spittle with that spittle, wash that pus with that pus, wash that blood with that blood?
P.: It should not be said thus. …
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.