[1085] S. Is dependent origination (paṭiccasamuppāda) unconditioned (asaṅkhata)?
P. Yes.
S. Is ignorance (avijjā) unconditioned?
P. It should not be said so. …
S. Is ignorance conditioned (saṅkhata)?
P. Yes.
S. Is dependent origination conditioned?
P. It should not be said so. …
S. Is dependent origination unconditioned?
P. Yes.
S. Are the volitional formations (saṅkhārā) that have ignorance as condition (avijjāpaccayā) unconditioned?
P. It should not be said so. …
S. Are the volitional formations that have ignorance as condition conditioned?
P. Yes.
S. Is dependent origination conditioned?
P. It should not be said so. …
S. Is dependent origination unconditioned?
P. Yes.
S. Is the consciousness (viññāṇa) that has volitional formations as condition unconditioned?
P. It should not be said so. …
S. Is the consciousness that has volitional formations as condition conditioned?
P. Yes.
S. Is dependent origination conditioned?
P. It should not be said so. …
S. Is dependent origination unconditioned?
P. Yes.
S. Is the name-and-form (nāmarūpa) that has consciousness as condition unconditioned?
P. It should not be said so. …
S. Is the name-and-form that has consciousness as condition conditioned?
P. Yes.
S. Is dependent origination conditioned?
P. It should not be said so. …
S. Is dependent origination unconditioned?
P. Yes.
S. Is the aging-and-death (jarāmaraṇa) that has birth (jāti) as condition unconditioned?
P. It should not be said so. …
S. Is the aging-and-death that has birth as condition conditioned?
P. Yes.
S. Is dependent origination conditioned?
P. It should not be said so. …
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.