[1222] In whomever the latent tendency of sensual lust (kāmarāgānusaya) lies latent, does the latent tendency of repulsion (paṭighānusaya) lie latent in him?
Yes (āmantā).
Or, in whomever the latent tendency of repulsion lies latent, does the latent tendency of sensual lust lie latent in him?
Yes.
In whomever the latent tendency of sensual lust lies latent, does the latent tendency of conceit (mānānusaya) lie latent in him?
Yes.
Or, in whomever the latent tendency of conceit lies latent, does the latent tendency of sensual lust lie latent in him?
In the non-returner (anāgāmī) the latent tendency of conceit lies latent, but the latent tendency of sensual lust does not lie latent in him; in three persons both the latent tendency of conceit lies latent and the latent tendency of sensual lust lies latent.
In whomever the latent tendency of sensual lust lies latent, does the latent tendency of views (diṭṭhānusaya) lie latent in him?
In two persons the latent tendency of sensual lust lies latent, but the latent tendency of views does not lie latent in them; in the ordinary person (puthujjana) both the latent tendency of sensual lust lies latent and the latent tendency of views lies latent.
[Or, in whomever the latent tendency of views lies latent, does the latent tendency of sensual lust] lie latent in him?
Yes.
In whomever the latent tendency of sensual lust lies latent, does the latent tendency of doubt (vicikicchānusaya) lie latent in him?
In two persons the latent tendency of sensual lust lies latent, but the latent tendency of doubt does not lie latent in them; in the ordinary person both the latent tendency of sensual lust lies latent and the latent tendency of doubt lies latent.
Or, in whomever the latent tendency of doubt lies latent, does the latent tendency of sensual lust lie latent in him?
Yes.
In whomever the latent tendency of sensual lust lies latent, does the latent tendency of lust for existence (bhavarāgānusaya) lie latent in him?
Yes.
Or, in whomever the latent tendency of lust for existence lies latent, does the latent tendency of sensual lust lie latent in him?
In the non-returner the latent tendency of lust for existence lies latent, but the latent tendency of sensual lust does not lie latent in him; in three persons both the latent tendency of lust for existence lies latent and the latent tendency of sensual lust lies latent.
In whomever the latent tendency of sensual lust lies latent, does the latent tendency of ignorance (avijjānusaya) lie latent in him?
Yes.
Or, in whomever the latent tendency of ignorance lies latent, does the latent tendency of sensual lust lie latent in him?
In the non-returner the latent tendency of ignorance lies latent, but the latent tendency of sensual lust does not lie latent in him; in three persons both the latent tendency of ignorance lies latent and the latent tendency of sensual lust lies latent.
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.