[1275] Where the latent tendency to sensual lust (kāmarāgānusaya), the latent tendency to repulsion (paṭighānusaya), the latent tendency to conceit (mānānusaya), the latent tendency to views (diṭṭhānusaya), and the latent tendency to doubt (vicikicchānusaya) do not lie latent, does the latent tendency to lust for existence (bhavarāgānusaya) not lie latent there?
Yes.
Or rather, where the latent tendency to lust for existence does not lie latent, do the latent tendency to sensual lust, the latent tendency to repulsion, the latent tendency to conceit, the latent tendency to views, and the latent tendency to doubt not lie latent there?
In painful feeling (dukkhā vedanā): here the latent tendency to lust for existence, the latent tendency to sensual lust, and the latent tendency to conceit do not lie latent, but it is not the case that the latent tendency to repulsion, the latent tendency to views, and the latent tendency to doubt do not lie latent there. In the two feelings in the sense-desire element (kāmadhātu): here the latent tendency to lust for existence and the latent tendency to repulsion do not lie latent, but it is not the case that the latent tendency to sensual lust, the latent tendency to conceit, the latent tendency to views, and the latent tendency to doubt do not lie latent there. In the unincluded (apariyāpanna): here the latent tendency to lust for existence does not lie latent, and the latent tendency to sensual lust, the latent tendency to repulsion, the latent tendency to conceit, the latent tendency to views, and the latent tendency to doubt do not lie latent. …
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.