[1464] From where one does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust (kāmarāgānusaya), does one not fully understand the latent tendency of repulsion (paṭighānusaya) from there?
In the case of painful feeling (dukkhā vedanā), one does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust from there, but it is not the case that one does not fully understand the latent tendency of repulsion from there. In the case of the form element (rūpadhātu), the formless element (arūpadhātu), and the unincluded (apariyāpanna), one does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust from there and does not fully understand the latent tendency of repulsion from there.
Or else, from where one does not fully understand the latent tendency of repulsion, does one not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust from there?
In the case of the two feelings in the sense-sphere element (kāmadhātu), one does not fully understand the latent tendency of repulsion from there, but it is not the case that one does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust from there. In the case of the form element, the formless element, and the unincluded, one does not fully understand the latent tendency of repulsion from there and does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust from there.
From where one does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust, does one not fully understand the latent tendency of conceit (mānānusaya) from there?
In the case of the form element and the formless element, one does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust from there, but it is not the case that one does not fully understand the latent tendency of conceit from there. In the case of painful feeling and the unincluded, one does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust from there and does not fully understand the latent tendency of conceit from there.
Or else, from where one does not fully understand the latent tendency of conceit, does one not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust from there?
Yes.
From where one does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust, does one not fully understand the latent tendency of view (diṭṭhānusaya) … the latent tendency of doubt (vicikicchānusaya) from there?
In the case of painful feeling, the form element, and the formless element, one does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust from there, but it is not the case that one does not fully understand the latent tendency of doubt from there. In the case of the unincluded, one does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust from there and does not fully understand the latent tendency of doubt from there.
Or else, from where one does not fully understand the latent tendency of doubt, does one not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust from there?
Yes.
From where one does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust, does one not fully understand the latent tendency of lust for existence (bhavarāgānusaya) from there?
In the case of the form element and the formless element, one does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust from there, but it is not the case that one does not fully understand the latent tendency of lust for existence from there. In the case of painful feeling and the unincluded, one does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust from there and does not fully understand the latent tendency of lust for existence from there.
Or else, from where one does not fully understand the latent tendency of lust for existence, does one not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust from there?
In the case of the two feelings in the sense-sphere element, one does not fully understand the latent tendency of lust for existence from there, but it is not the case that one does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust from there. In the case of painful feeling and the unincluded, one does not fully understand the latent tendency of lust for existence from there and does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust from there.
From where one does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust, does one not fully understand the latent tendency of ignorance (avijjānusaya) from there?
In the case of painful feeling, the form element, and the formless element, one does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust from there, but it is not the case that one does not fully understand the latent tendency of ignorance from there. In the case of the unincluded, one does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust from there and does not fully understand the latent tendency of ignorance from there.
Or else, from where one does not fully understand the latent tendency of ignorance, does one not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust from there?
Yes.
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.