[447] Is what is not pleasure (sukha) not a faculty (indriya)?
Setting aside pleasure, the remaining faculties are not pleasure, yet they are faculties; setting aside pleasure and the faculties, the rest are neither pleasure nor faculties.
Is what is not a faculty not the pleasure faculty (sukhindriya)?
Yes (āmantā).
Is what is not pain (dukkha) not a faculty?
Setting aside pain, the remaining faculties are not pain, yet they are faculties; setting aside pain and the faculties, the rest are neither pain nor faculties.
Is what is not a faculty not the pain faculty (dukkhindriya)?
Yes.
Is what is not joy (somanassa) not a faculty?
Setting aside joy, the remaining faculties are not joy, yet they are faculties; setting aside joy and the faculties, the rest are neither joy nor faculties.
Is what is not a faculty not the joy faculty (somanassindriya)?
Yes.
Is what is not grief (domanassa) not a faculty?
Setting aside grief, the remaining faculties are not grief, yet they are faculties; setting aside grief and the faculties, the rest are neither grief nor faculties.
Is what is not a faculty not the grief faculty (domanassindriya)?
Yes.
Is what is not equanimity (upekkhā) not a faculty?
Setting aside equanimity, the remaining faculties are not equanimity, yet they are faculties; setting aside equanimity and the faculties, the rest are neither equanimity nor faculties.
Is what is not a faculty not the equanimity faculty (upekkhindriya)?
Yes.
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.