[466] Is what is not the eye (cakkhu) not a faculty (indriya)?
Setting aside the eye, the remaining faculties are not the eye, but are faculties; setting aside the eye and the faculties, the remaining [phenomena] are neither the eye nor faculties.
Is what is not a faculty not the ear faculty (sotindriya)?
Yes (āmantā).
Is what is not the eye not a faculty?
Setting aside the eye, the remaining faculties are not the eye, but are faculties; setting aside the eye and the faculties, the remaining [phenomena] are neither the eye nor faculties.
Is what is not a faculty not the nose faculty (ghānindriya)?
Yes. …
Is what is not the eye not a faculty?
Setting aside the eye, the remaining faculties are not the eye, but are faculties; setting aside the eye and the faculties, the remaining [phenomena] are neither the eye nor faculties.
Is what is not a faculty not the perfect-knower faculty (aññātāvindriya)?
Yes.
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.