[473] Is what is not the male (purisa) not a faculty (indriya)?
Setting aside the male, the remaining faculties are not the male but are faculties; setting aside the male and the faculties, the rest are neither the male nor faculties.
Is what is not a faculty not the eye-faculty (cakkhundriya)?
Yes. …
Is what is not the male not a faculty?
Setting aside the male, the remaining faculties are not the male but are faculties; setting aside the male and the faculties, the rest are neither the male nor faculties.
Is what is not a faculty not the perfect-knower faculty (aññātāvindriya)?
Yes.
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.