[46] Might it be that, dependent on a wholesome phenomenon (dhamma), a wholesome phenomenon would arise, not by way of the object condition (ārammaṇa-paccaya)? Not by way of the predominance condition (adhipati-paccaya)? Not by way of the immediacy condition (anantara-paccaya)? Not by way of the contiguity condition (samanantara-paccaya)? Not by way of the connascence condition (sahajāta-paccaya)? Not by way of the mutuality condition (aññamañña-paccaya)? Not by way of the dependence condition (nissaya-paccaya)? Not by way of the decisive-support condition (upanissaya-paccaya)? Not by way of the prenascence condition (purejāta-paccaya)? Not by way of the postnascence condition (pacchājāta-paccaya)? Not by way of the repetition condition (āsevana-paccaya)? Not by way of the kamma condition (kamma-paccaya)? Not by way of the kamma-result condition (vipāka-paccaya)? Not by way of the nutriment condition (āhāra-paccaya)? Not by way of the faculty condition (indriya-paccaya)? Not by way of the absorption condition (jhāna-paccaya)? Not by way of the path condition (magga-paccaya)? Not by way of the association condition (sampayutta-paccaya)? Not by way of the dissociation condition (vippayutta-paccaya)? Not by way of the presence condition (atthi-paccaya)? Not by way of the absence condition (natthi-paccaya)? Not by way of the disappearance condition (vigata-paccaya)? Not by way of the non-disappearance condition (avigata-paccaya)?
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.