[271] By three modes, for one who, wishing to say "I attained the first jhāna," knowingly speaks the falsehood "I attained the second jhāna": when the one addressed understands, there is an offense of pārājika; when he does not understand, there is an offense of thullaccaya. … By three modes, for one who, wishing to say "I attained the first jhāna," knowingly speaks the falsehood "I attained the third jhāna": when the one addressed understands, there is an offense of pārājika; when he does not understand, there is an offense of thullaccaya. … By three modes, for one who, wishing to say "I attained the first jhāna," knowingly speaks the falsehood "I attained the fourth jhāna": when the one addressed understands, there is an offense of pārājika; when he does not understand, there is an offense of thullaccaya. …
By three modes, for one who, wishing to say "I attained the first jhāna," knowingly speaks the falsehood "I attained the emptiness liberation … the signless liberation … the undirected liberation … the emptiness concentration (samādhi) … the signless concentration … the undirected concentration … the emptiness attainment … the signless attainment … the undirected attainment … the three true knowledges … the four establishments of mindfulness (satipaṭṭhāna) … the four right strivings … the four bases of spiritual power … the five faculties … the five powers … the seven factors of awakening (bojjhaṅga) … the noble eightfold path … the fruit of stream-entry … the fruit of once-returning … the fruit of non-returning … the fruit of arahantship": when the one addressed understands, there is an offense of pārājika; when he does not understand, there is an offense of thullaccaya. …
By three modes, for one who, wishing to say "I attained the first jhāna," knowingly speaks the falsehood "Greed (lobha; here rāga) has been given up by me …" — "Hatred (dosa) has been given up by me …" — "Delusion (moha) has been given up by me, disgorged, released, abandoned, relinquished, cast out, fully cast out": when the one addressed understands, there is an offense of pārājika; when he does not understand, there is an offense of thullaccaya. … By three modes, for one who, wishing to say "I attained the first jhāna," knowingly speaks the falsehood "My mind (citta) is rid of the hindrance of greed; my mind is rid of the hindrance of hatred; my mind is rid of the hindrance of delusion": when the one addressed understands, there is an offense of pārājika; when he does not understand, there is an offense of thullaccaya — [that is:] beforehand he knows, "I shall speak falsehood"; while speaking he knows, "I am speaking falsehood"; having spoken he knows, "Falsehood has been spoken by me"; misrepresenting his view, misrepresenting his conviction, misrepresenting his approval, misrepresenting his state.
The section-wheel (khaṇḍacakka) of the expository clause concerning the substitution of the object is finished.
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.