[1578] Sakavādin: Is obsession (pariyuṭṭhāna) dissociated from mind (citta)?
Paravādin: Yes.
S: Is it form (rūpa), is it Nibbāna, is it the eye base (cakkhāyatana), … is it the tangible base (phoṭṭhabbāyatana)?
P: It should not be said thus. …
S: Is obsession dissociated from mind?
P: Yes.
S: Is there no mind with lust (sarāga), no mind with hatred (sadosa), no mind with delusion (samoha), … no unwholesome (akusala) mind, no defiled (saṅkiliṭṭha) mind?
P: It should not be said thus. …
S: Is there not a mind with lust, a mind with hatred, a mind with delusion, … an unwholesome mind, a defiled mind?
P: Yes.
S: If there is a mind with lust, a mind with hatred, a mind with delusion, … an unwholesome mind, a defiled mind, then indeed, good sir, it should not be said that obsession is dissociated from mind.
The Discussion "Obsession Is Dissociated from Mind" (Pariyuṭṭhānaṃ Cittavippayuttantikathā) is ended.
________________
Discussion of the Included (Pariyāpannakathā)
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.