[721] S. The Tathāgata's power (tathāgatabala) — the knowledge (ñāṇa) as it really is (yathābhūta) regarding the possible and the impossible (ṭhānāṭhāna) — is noble (ariya)?
P. Yes.
S. Does it have emptiness (suññatā) as its object (ārammaṇa)?
P. It should not be said thus. …
S. Does it have emptiness as its object?
P. Yes.
S. Does he attend to the possible and the impossible and attend to emptiness?
P. It should not be said thus. …
S. Does he attend to the possible and the impossible and attend to emptiness?
P. Yes.
S. Is there a conjunction of two contacts (phassa), of two minds (citta)?
P. It should not be said thus. …
S. The Tathāgata's power — the knowledge as it really is regarding the possible and the impossible — is noble?
P. Yes.
S. Does it have the signless (animitta) as its object? … Does it have the desireless (appaṇihita) as its object?
P. It should not be said thus. …
S. Does it have the desireless as its object?
P. Yes.
S. Does he attend to the possible and the impossible and attend to the desireless?
P. It should not be said thus. …
S. Does he attend to the possible and the impossible and attend to the desireless?
P. Yes.
S. Is there a conjunction of two contacts, of two minds?
P. It should not be said thus. …
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.