[1435] From where one fully understands the latent tendency of doubt (vicikicchānusaya), does one from there fully understand the latent tendency of lust for existence (bhavarāgānusaya)?
In the sense-sphere element (kāmadhātu), in the three feelings (vedanā): from there one fully understands the latent tendency of doubt, but one does not from there fully understand the latent tendency of lust for existence. In the form element (rūpadhātu) and in the formless element (arūpadhātu): from there one fully understands both the latent tendency of doubt and fully understands the latent tendency of lust for existence.
Or else, from where one fully understands the latent tendency of lust for existence, does one from there fully understand the latent tendency of doubt?
Yes.
From where one fully understands the latent tendency of doubt, does one from there fully understand the latent tendency of ignorance (avijjānusaya)?
Yes.
Or else, from where one fully understands the latent tendency of ignorance, does one from there fully understand the latent tendency of doubt?
Yes.
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.