Pajahnavāra

Abhidhammapiṭaka · Yamaka (1) · Vol. 38 · Section 1466

[1466] From wherever one does not fully understand (parijānāti) the latent tendency of conceit (mānānusaya), does one from there not fully understand the latent tendency of views (diṭṭhānusaya) … the latent tendency of doubt (vicikicchānusaya)? In painful feeling (dukkhā vedanā), one does not fully understand the latent tendency of conceit from there, but it is not that one does not fully understand the latent tendency of doubt from there; in the unincluded (apariyāpanna), one does not fully understand the latent tendency of conceit from there and does not fully understand the latent tendency of doubt. Or rather, from wherever one does not fully understand the latent tendency of doubt, does one from there not fully understand the latent tendency of conceit? Yes. From wherever one does not fully understand the latent tendency of conceit, does one from there not fully understand the latent tendency of lust for existence (bhavarāgānusaya)? Yes. Or rather, from wherever one does not fully understand the latent tendency of lust for existence, does one from there not fully understand the latent tendency of conceit? In the two feelings in the sense-sphere element (kāmadhātu), one does not fully understand the latent tendency of lust for existence from there, but it is not that one does not fully understand the latent tendency of conceit from there; in painful feeling and in the unincluded, one does not fully understand the latent tendency of lust for existence from there and does not fully understand the latent tendency of conceit. From wherever one does not fully understand the latent tendency of conceit, does one from there not fully understand the latent tendency of ignorance (avijjānusaya)? In painful feeling, one does not fully understand the latent tendency of conceit from there, but it is not that one does not fully understand the latent tendency of ignorance from there; in the unincluded, one does not fully understand the latent tendency of conceit from there and does not fully understand the latent tendency of ignorance. Or rather, from wherever one does not fully understand the latent tendency of ignorance, does one from there not fully understand the latent tendency of conceit? Yes.

English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.

This passage also appears in 5 other places