[19] Whatever phenomena (dhammā) are name (nāma) — are they all name-root-roots (nāmamūlamūla)?
There are only nine name-root-roots; the remaining phenomena that are name are not name-root-roots.
Or, whatever are name-root-roots — are all those phenomena name?
Yes.
Whatever phenomena are name — do they all have a single root-root in common with the name-root (nāmamūla)?
Rootless (ahetuka) name does not have a single root-root in common with the name-root; name with roots (sahetuka) has a single root-root in common with the name-root.
Or, whatever have a single root-root in common with the name-root — are all those phenomena name?
Form (rūpa) originated by name (nāmasamuṭṭhāna) has a single root-root in common with the name-root, but is not name; name both has a single root-root in common with the name-root and is name.
Whatever phenomena have a single root-root in common with the name-root — do they all have mutual root-roots with the name-root?
Whatever roots that are name-roots arise together — they both have a single root-root in common and have mutual root-roots; the remaining phenomena co-arisen with the name-root have a single root-root in common with the name-root, but do not have mutual root-roots.
Or, whatever have mutual root-roots with the name-root — are all those phenomena name?
Yes.
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.