[479] Is what is not equanimity (upekkhā) not a faculty (indriya)?
Setting aside equanimity, the remaining faculties are not equanimity, but are faculties; setting aside equanimity and the faculties, the rest are neither equanimity nor faculties.
Is what is not a faculty not the eye faculty (cakkhundriya)?
Yes. …
Is what is not equanimity not a faculty?
Setting aside equanimity, the remaining faculties are not equanimity, but are faculties; setting aside equanimity and the faculties, the rest are neither equanimity nor faculties.
Is what is not a faculty not the perfect-knower faculty (aññātāvindriya)?
Yes.
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.