[1345] Whoever, from wherever, is without the latent tendency of conceit (mānānusaya) — is he, from there, without the latent tendency of views (diṭṭhānusaya) … without the latent tendency of doubt (vicikicchānusaya)?
The ordinary person (puthujjana) — in regard to painful feeling (dukkhā vedanā): he, from there, is without the latent tendency of conceit, but it is not the case that he, from there, is without the latent tendency of doubt. That same person — in regard to the unincluded (apariyāpanna): he, from there, is without the latent tendency of conceit and without the latent tendency of doubt. The Arahant (arahā) is everywhere without the latent tendency of conceit and without the latent tendency of doubt.
Or rather, whoever, from wherever, is without the latent tendency of doubt — is he, from there, without the latent tendency of conceit?
Three persons — in regard to the two feelings in the sense-sphere element (kāmadhātu), in the form element (rūpadhātu), and in the formless element (arūpadhātu): they, from there, are without the latent tendency of doubt, but it is not the case that they, from there, are without the latent tendency of conceit. Those same persons — in regard to painful feeling and the unincluded: they, from there, are without the latent tendency of doubt and without the latent tendency of conceit. The Arahant is everywhere without the latent tendency of doubt and without the latent tendency of conceit.
Whoever, from wherever, is without the latent tendency of conceit — is he, from there, without the latent tendency of lust for existence (bhavarāgānusaya)?
Yes.
Or rather, whoever, from wherever, is without the latent tendency of lust for existence — is he, from there, without the latent tendency of conceit?
Four persons — in regard to the two feelings in the sense-sphere element: they, from there, are without the latent tendency of lust for existence, but it is not the case that they, from there, are without the latent tendency of conceit. Those same persons — in regard to painful feeling and the unincluded: they, from there, are without the latent tendency of lust for existence and without the latent tendency of conceit. The Arahant is everywhere without the latent tendency of lust for existence and without the latent tendency of conceit.
Whoever, from wherever, is without the latent tendency of conceit — is he, from there, without the latent tendency of ignorance (avijjānusaya)?
Four persons — in regard to painful feeling: they, from there, are without the latent tendency of conceit, but it is not the case that they, from there, are without the latent tendency of ignorance. Those same persons — in regard to the unincluded: they, from there, are without the latent tendency of conceit and without the latent tendency of ignorance. The Arahant is everywhere without the latent tendency of conceit and without the latent tendency of ignorance.
Or rather, whoever, from wherever, is without the latent tendency of ignorance — is he, from there, without the latent tendency of conceit?
Yes.
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.