[1344] Whoever is without the latent tendency of repulsion (paṭighānusaya) in regard to any [place] — is that one without the latent tendency of conceit (mānānusaya) in regard to that [place]?
Three persons — in the two feelings (vedanā) in the sense-sphere element (kāmadhātu), in the form element (rūpadhātu), and in the formless element (arūpadhātu): they, in regard to those, are without the latent tendency of repulsion, but it is not the case that they, in regard to those, are without the latent tendency of conceit. Those same persons — in the unincluded (apariyāpanna): they, in regard to that, are both without the latent tendency of repulsion and without the latent tendency of conceit. The Non-Returner (anāgāmī) — in the two feelings in the sense-sphere element, in the form element, and in the formless element: he, in regard to those, is without the latent tendency of repulsion, but it is not the case that he, in regard to those, is without the latent tendency of conceit. That same person — in painful feeling (dukkhā vedanā) and in the unincluded: he, in regard to those, is both without the latent tendency of repulsion and without the latent tendency of conceit. The Arahant (arahā), everywhere, is both without the latent tendency of repulsion and without the latent tendency of conceit.
Or rather, whoever is without the latent tendency of conceit in regard to any [place] — is that one without the latent tendency of repulsion in regard to that [place]?
Three persons — in painful feeling: they, in regard to that, are without the latent tendency of conceit, but it is not the case that they, in regard to that, are without the latent tendency of repulsion. Those same persons — in the unincluded: they, in regard to that, are both without the latent tendency of conceit and without the latent tendency of repulsion. The Arahant, everywhere, is both without the latent tendency of conceit and without the latent tendency of repulsion.
Whoever is without the latent tendency of repulsion in regard to any [place] — is that one without the latent tendency of view (diṭṭhānusaya) … without the latent tendency of doubt (vicikicchānusaya) in regard to that [place]?
The ordinary person (puthujjana) — in the two feelings in the sense-sphere element, in the form element, and in the formless element: he, in regard to those, is without the latent tendency of repulsion, but it is not the case that he, in regard to those, is without the latent tendency of doubt. That same person — in the unincluded: he, in regard to that, is both without the latent tendency of repulsion and without the latent tendency of doubt. Two persons, everywhere, are both without the latent tendency of repulsion and without the latent tendency of doubt.
Or rather, whoever is without the latent tendency of doubt in regard to any [place] — is that one without the latent tendency of repulsion in regard to that [place]?
Two persons — in painful feeling: they, in regard to that, are without the latent tendency of doubt, but it is not the case that they, in regard to that, are without the latent tendency of repulsion. Those same persons — in the two feelings in the sense-sphere element, in the form element, in the formless element, and in the unincluded: they, in regard to those, are both without the latent tendency of doubt and without the latent tendency of repulsion. Two persons, everywhere, are both without the latent tendency of doubt and without the latent tendency of repulsion.
Whoever is without the latent tendency of repulsion in regard to any [place] — is that one without the latent tendency of lust for existence (bhavarāgānusaya) in regard to that [place]?
Three persons — in the form element and in the formless element: they, in regard to those, are without the latent tendency of repulsion, but it is not the case that they, in regard to those, are without the latent tendency of lust for existence. Those same persons — in the two feelings in the sense-sphere element and in the unincluded: they, in regard to those, are both without the latent tendency of repulsion and without the latent tendency of lust for existence. The Non-Returner — in the form element and in the formless element: he, in regard to those, is without the latent tendency of repulsion, but it is not the case that he, in regard to those, is without the latent tendency of lust for existence. That same person — in the three feelings in the sense-sphere element and in the unincluded: he, in regard to those, is both without the latent tendency of repulsion and without the latent tendency of lust for existence. The Arahant, everywhere, is both without the latent tendency of repulsion and without the latent tendency of lust for existence.
Or rather, whoever is without the latent tendency of lust for existence in regard to any [place] — is that one without the latent tendency of repulsion in regard to that [place]?
Three persons — in painful feeling: they, in regard to that, are without the latent tendency of lust for existence, but it is not the case that they, in regard to that, are without the latent tendency of repulsion. Those same persons — in the two feelings in the sense-sphere element and in the unincluded: they, in regard to those, are both without the latent tendency of lust for existence and without the latent tendency of repulsion. The Arahant, everywhere, is both without the latent tendency of lust for existence and without the latent tendency of repulsion.
Whoever is without the latent tendency of repulsion in regard to any [place] — is that one without the latent tendency of ignorance (avijjānusaya) in regard to that [place]?
Three persons — in the two feelings in the sense-sphere element, in the form element, and in the formless element: they, in regard to those, are without the latent tendency of repulsion, but it is not the case that they, in regard to those, are without the latent tendency of ignorance. Those same persons — in the unincluded: they, in regard to that, are both without the latent tendency of repulsion and without the latent tendency of ignorance. The Non-Returner — in the three feelings in the sense-sphere element, in the form element, and in the formless element: he, in regard to those, is without the latent tendency of repulsion, but it is not the case that he, in regard to those, is without the latent tendency of ignorance. That same person — in the unincluded: he, in regard to that, is both without the latent tendency of repulsion and without the latent tendency of ignorance. The Arahant, everywhere, is both without the latent tendency of repulsion and without the latent tendency of ignorance.
Or rather, whoever is without the latent tendency of ignorance in regard to any [place] — is that one without the latent tendency of repulsion in regard to that [place]?
Yes.
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.