Pahīnavāra

Abhidhammapiṭaka · Yamaka (1) · Vol. 38 · Section 1513

[1513] Where the latent tendency of sensual lust (kāmarāgānusaya) and the latent tendency of repulsion (paṭighānusaya) are abandoned, is the latent tendency of conceit (mānānusaya) abandoned there? There is none. Or else, where the latent tendency of conceit is abandoned, are the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion abandoned there? In the form element (rūpadhātu) and in the formless element (arūpadhātu): here the latent tendency of conceit is abandoned; the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion are not to be said to be either abandoned or unabandoned. In the two feelings (vedanā) in the sense-sphere element (kāmadhātu): here the latent tendency of conceit and the latent tendency of sensual lust are abandoned; the latent tendency of repulsion is not to be said to be either abandoned or unabandoned. Where the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion are abandoned, is the latent tendency of view (diṭṭhānusaya) … the latent tendency of doubt (vicikicchānusaya) abandoned there? There is none. Or else, where the latent tendency of doubt is abandoned, are the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion abandoned there? In the form element and in the formless element: here the latent tendency of doubt is abandoned; the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion are not to be said to be either abandoned or unabandoned. In the two feelings in the sense-sphere element: here the latent tendency of doubt and the latent tendency of sensual lust are abandoned; the latent tendency of repulsion is not to be said to be either abandoned or unabandoned. In painful feeling (dukkhā vedanā): here the latent tendency of doubt and the latent tendency of repulsion are abandoned; the latent tendency of sensual lust is not to be said to be either abandoned or unabandoned. Where the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion are abandoned, is the latent tendency of lust for existence (bhavarāgānusaya) abandoned there? There is none. Or else, where the latent tendency of lust for existence is abandoned, are the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion abandoned there? They are not to be said to be either abandoned or unabandoned. Where the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion are abandoned, is the latent tendency of ignorance (avijjānusaya) abandoned there? There is none. Or else, where the latent tendency of ignorance is abandoned, are the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion abandoned there? In the form element and in the formless element: here the latent tendency of ignorance is abandoned; the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion are not to be said to be either abandoned or unabandoned. In the two feelings in the sense-sphere element: here the latent tendency of ignorance and the latent tendency of sensual lust are abandoned; the latent tendency of repulsion is not to be said to be either abandoned or unabandoned. In painful feeling: here the latent tendency of ignorance and the latent tendency of repulsion are abandoned; the latent tendency of sensual lust is not to be said to be either abandoned or unabandoned.

English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.

This passage also appears in 5 other places