Pahīnavāra

Abhidhammapiṭaka · Yamaka (1) · Vol. 38 · Section 1546

[1546] Where the latent tendency of sensual lust (kāmarāgānusaya) and the latent tendency of repulsion (paṭighānusaya) are unabandoned, is the latent tendency of conceit (mānānusaya) unabandoned there? There is none. Or rather, where the latent tendency of conceit is unabandoned, are the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion unabandoned there? In the form element (rūpadhātu) and in the formless element (arūpadhātu): here the latent tendency of conceit is unabandoned; the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion should not be said to be either abandoned or unabandoned. In the sense-sphere element (kāmadhātu), in the two feelings (vedanā): here the latent tendency of conceit and the latent tendency of sensual lust are unabandoned; the latent tendency of repulsion should not be said to be either abandoned or unabandoned. Where the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion are unabandoned, is the latent tendency of views (diṭṭhānusaya) … the latent tendency of doubt (vicikicchānusaya) unabandoned there? There is none. Or rather, where the latent tendency of doubt is unabandoned, are the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion unabandoned there? In the form element and in the formless element: here the latent tendency of doubt is unabandoned; the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion should not be said to be either abandoned or unabandoned. In the sense-sphere element, in the two feelings: here the latent tendency of doubt and the latent tendency of sensual lust are unabandoned; the latent tendency of repulsion should not be said to be either abandoned or unabandoned. In painful feeling (dukkhā vedanā): here the latent tendency of doubt and the latent tendency of repulsion are unabandoned; the latent tendency of sensual lust should not be said to be either abandoned or unabandoned. Where the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion are unabandoned, is the latent tendency of lust for existence (bhavarāgānusaya) unabandoned there? There is none. Or rather, where the latent tendency of lust for existence is unabandoned, are the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion unabandoned there? They should not be said to be either abandoned or unabandoned. Where the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion are unabandoned, is the latent tendency of ignorance (avijjānusaya) unabandoned there? There is none. Or rather, where the latent tendency of ignorance is unabandoned, are the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion unabandoned there? In the form element and in the formless element: here the latent tendency of ignorance is unabandoned; the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion should not be said to be either abandoned or unabandoned. In the sense-sphere element, in the two feelings: here the latent tendency of ignorance and the latent tendency of sensual lust are unabandoned; the latent tendency of repulsion should not be said to be either abandoned or unabandoned. In painful feeling: here the latent tendency of ignorance and the latent tendency of repulsion are unabandoned; the latent tendency of sensual lust should not be said to be either abandoned or unabandoned.

English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.

This passage also appears in 5 other places