[564] In dependence on a phenomenon (dhamma) that is both a tie (gantha) and subject to ties (ganthaniya), there arises a phenomenon that is both a tie and subject to ties, by root condition (hetu-paccaya): in dependence on the bodily tie (kāyagantha) of adherence to rules and rituals (sīlabbataparāmāsa), there arises the bodily tie of covetousness (abhijjhā); in dependence on the bodily tie of covetousness, there arises the bodily tie of adherence to rules and rituals; in dependence on the bodily tie of dogmatic insistence that "this is truth" (idaṃsaccābhinivesa), there arises the bodily tie of covetousness; in dependence on the bodily tie of covetousness, there arises the bodily tie of dogmatic insistence that "this is truth."
In dependence on a phenomenon that is both a tie and subject to ties, there arises a phenomenon that is subject to ties but not a tie, by root condition: in dependence on the ties, there arise the associated aggregates (sampayuttakā khandhā) and mind-originated form (cittasamuṭṭhāna-rūpa).
In dependence on a phenomenon that is both a tie and subject to ties, there arise a phenomenon that is both a tie and subject to ties, and a phenomenon that is subject to ties but not a tie, by root condition: …
The Dependence Section (paṭiccavāra), the Conascence Section (sahajātavāra), the Condition Section (paccayavāra), the Support Section (nissayavāra), the Conjoined Section (saṃsaṭṭhavāra), and the Association Section (sampayuttavāra) are the same as [those of] the Tie Dyad (gantha-duka), without any difference.
The Question Section (Pañhāvāra)
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.