Sānusayavāra

Abhidhammapiṭaka · Yamaka (1) · Vol. 38 · Section 1332

[1332] From where one is without the latent tendency of sensual lust (kāmarāgānusaya), is one therefrom without the latent tendency of repulsion (paṭighānusaya)? In painful feeling (dukkhā vedanā), therefrom one is without the latent tendency of sensual lust, but it is not the case that therefrom one is without the latent tendency of repulsion. In the form element (rūpadhātu), in the formless element (arūpadhātu), and in the not-included (apariyāpanna), therefrom one is both without the latent tendency of sensual lust and without the latent tendency of repulsion. Or else, from where one is without the latent tendency of repulsion, is one therefrom without the latent tendency of sensual lust? In the two feelings in the sense-sphere element (kāmadhātu), therefrom one is without the latent tendency of repulsion, but it is not the case that therefrom one is without the latent tendency of sensual lust. In the form element, in the formless element, and in the not-included, therefrom one is both without the latent tendency of repulsion and without the latent tendency of sensual lust. From where one is without the latent tendency of sensual lust, is one therefrom without the latent tendency of conceit (mānānusaya)? In the form element and in the formless element, therefrom one is without the latent tendency of sensual lust, but it is not the case that therefrom one is without the latent tendency of conceit. In painful feeling and in the not-included, therefrom one is both without the latent tendency of sensual lust and without the latent tendency of conceit. Or else, from where one is without the latent tendency of conceit, is one therefrom without the latent tendency of sensual lust? Yes. From where one is without the latent tendency of sensual lust, is one therefrom without the latent tendency of views (diṭṭhānusaya) … without the latent tendency of doubt (vicikicchānusaya)? In painful feeling, in the form element, and in the formless element, therefrom one is without the latent tendency of sensual lust, but it is not the case that therefrom one is without the latent tendency of doubt. In the not-included, therefrom one is both without the latent tendency of sensual lust and without the latent tendency of doubt. Or else, from where one is without the latent tendency of doubt, is one therefrom without the latent tendency of sensual lust? Yes. From where one is without the latent tendency of sensual lust, is one therefrom without the latent tendency of lust for existence (bhavarāgānusaya)? In the form element and in the formless element, therefrom one is without the latent tendency of sensual lust, but it is not the case that therefrom one is without the latent tendency of lust for existence. In painful feeling and in the not-included, therefrom one is both without the latent tendency of sensual lust and without the latent tendency of lust for existence. Or else, from where one is without the latent tendency of lust for existence, is one therefrom without the latent tendency of sensual lust? In the two feelings in the sense-sphere element, therefrom one is without the latent tendency of lust for existence, but it is not the case that therefrom one is without the latent tendency of sensual lust. In painful feeling and in the not-included, therefrom one is both without the latent tendency of lust for existence and without the latent tendency of sensual lust. From where one is without the latent tendency of sensual lust, is one therefrom without the latent tendency of ignorance (avijjānusaya)? In painful feeling, in the form element, and in the formless element, therefrom one is without the latent tendency of sensual lust, but it is not the case that therefrom one is without the latent tendency of ignorance. In the not-included, therefrom one is both without the latent tendency of sensual lust and without the latent tendency of ignorance. Or else, from where one is without the latent tendency of ignorance, is one therefrom without the latent tendency of sensual lust? Yes.

English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.

This passage also appears in 5 other places