[1338] From where one is without latent tendency (niranusaya) through the latent tendency of sensual lust (kāmarāgānusaya) and the latent tendency of repulsion (paṭighānusaya), is one from there without latent tendency through the latent tendency of conceit (mānānusaya)?
In the form element (rūpadhātu) and in the formless element (arūpadhātu), from there one is without latent tendency through the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion, but it is not the case that from there one is without latent tendency through the latent tendency of conceit. In the unincluded (apariyāpanna), from there one is without latent tendency through the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion, and without latent tendency through the latent tendency of conceit.
Or rather, from where one is without latent tendency through the latent tendency of conceit, is one from there without latent tendency through the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion?
In painful feeling (dukkhā vedanā), from there one is without latent tendency through the latent tendency of conceit and the latent tendency of sensual lust, but it is not the case that from there one is without latent tendency through the latent tendency of repulsion. In the unincluded, from there one is without latent tendency through the latent tendency of conceit, and without latent tendency through the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion.
From where one is without latent tendency through the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion, is one from there without latent tendency through the latent tendency of view (diṭṭhānusaya) … through the latent tendency of doubt (vicikicchānusaya)?
In the form element and in the formless element, from there one is without latent tendency through the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion, but it is not the case that from there one is without latent tendency through the latent tendency of doubt. In the unincluded, from there one is without latent tendency through the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion, and without latent tendency through the latent tendency of doubt.
Or rather, from where one is without latent tendency through the latent tendency of doubt, is one from there without latent tendency through the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion?
Yes.
From where one is without latent tendency through the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion, is one from there without latent tendency through the latent tendency of lust for existence (bhavarāgānusaya)?
In the form element and in the formless element, from there one is without latent tendency through the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion, but it is not the case that from there one is without latent tendency through the latent tendency of lust for existence. In the unincluded, from there one is without latent tendency through the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion, and without latent tendency through the latent tendency of lust for existence.
Or rather, from where one is without latent tendency through the latent tendency of lust for existence, is one from there without latent tendency through the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion?
In painful feeling, from there one is without latent tendency through the latent tendency of lust for existence and the latent tendency of sensual lust, but it is not the case that from there one is without latent tendency through the latent tendency of repulsion. In the sense-sphere element (kāmadhātu), in two feelings, from there one is without latent tendency through the latent tendency of lust for existence and the latent tendency of repulsion, but it is not the case that from there one is without latent tendency through the latent tendency of sensual lust. In the unincluded, from there one is without latent tendency through the latent tendency of lust for existence, and without latent tendency through the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion.
From where one is without latent tendency through the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion, is one from there without latent tendency through the latent tendency of ignorance (avijjānusaya)?
In the form element and in the formless element, from there one is without latent tendency through the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion, but it is not the case that from there one is without latent tendency through the latent tendency of ignorance. In the unincluded, from there one is without latent tendency through the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion, and without latent tendency through the latent tendency of ignorance.
Or rather, from where one is without latent tendency through the latent tendency of ignorance, is one from there without latent tendency through the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion?
Yes.
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.