Pahīnavāra

Abhidhammapiṭaka · Yamaka (1) · Vol. 38 · Section 1507

[1507] Where the latent tendency to sensual lust (kāmarāgānusaya) is abandoned, is the latent tendency to repulsion (paṭighānusaya) abandoned there? It should not be said to be either "abandoned" or "not abandoned." Or else, where the latent tendency to repulsion is abandoned, is the latent tendency to sensual lust abandoned there? It should not be said to be either "abandoned" or "not abandoned." Where the latent tendency to sensual lust is abandoned, is the latent tendency to conceit (mānānusaya) abandoned there? Yes. Or else, where the latent tendency to conceit is abandoned, is the latent tendency to sensual lust abandoned there? In the form element (rūpadhātu) and in the formless element (arūpadhātu): therein the latent tendency to conceit is abandoned; the latent tendency to sensual lust should not be said to be either "abandoned" or "not abandoned." In the sense-sphere element (kāmadhātu), in the two feelings (vedanā): therein both the latent tendency to conceit is abandoned and the latent tendency to sensual lust is abandoned. Where the latent tendency to sensual lust is abandoned, is the latent tendency to views (diṭṭhānusaya) … the latent tendency to doubt (vicikicchānusaya) abandoned there? Yes. Or else, where the latent tendency to doubt is abandoned, is the latent tendency to sensual lust abandoned there? In painful feeling (dukkhā vedanā), in the form element, and in the formless element: therein the latent tendency to doubt is abandoned; the latent tendency to sensual lust should not be said to be either "abandoned" or "not abandoned." In the sense-sphere element, in the two feelings: therein both the latent tendency to doubt is abandoned and the latent tendency to sensual lust is abandoned. Where the latent tendency to sensual lust is abandoned, is the latent tendency to lust for existence (bhavarāgānusaya) abandoned there? It should not be said to be either "abandoned" or "not abandoned." Or else, where the latent tendency to lust for existence is abandoned, is the latent tendency to sensual lust abandoned there? It should not be said to be either "abandoned" or "not abandoned." Where the latent tendency to sensual lust is abandoned, is the latent tendency to ignorance (avijjānusaya) abandoned there? Yes. Or else, where the latent tendency to ignorance is abandoned, is the latent tendency to sensual lust abandoned there? In painful feeling, in the form element, and in the formless element: therein the latent tendency to ignorance is abandoned; the latent tendency to sensual lust should not be said to be either "abandoned" or "not abandoned." In the sense-sphere element, in the two feelings: therein both the latent tendency to ignorance is abandoned and the latent tendency to sensual lust is abandoned.

English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.

This passage also appears in 5 other places