[1540] Where the latent tendency of sensual lust (kāmarāgānusaya) is unabandoned, is the latent tendency of repulsion (paṭighānusaya) unabandoned there?
It should not be said to be either abandoned or unabandoned.
Or rather, where the latent tendency of repulsion is unabandoned, is the latent tendency of sensual lust unabandoned there?
It should not be said to be either abandoned or unabandoned.
Where the latent tendency of sensual lust is unabandoned, is the latent tendency of conceit (mānānusaya) unabandoned there?
Yes.
Or rather, where the latent tendency of conceit is unabandoned, is the latent tendency of sensual lust unabandoned there?
In the form element (rūpadhātu) and in the formless element (arūpadhātu): here the latent tendency of conceit is unabandoned, but the latent tendency of sensual lust should not be said to be either abandoned or unabandoned. In the sense-desire element (kāmadhātu), in the two feelings (vedanā): here both the latent tendency of conceit is unabandoned and the latent tendency of sensual lust is unabandoned.
Where the latent tendency of sensual lust is unabandoned, is the latent tendency of views (diṭṭhānusaya) … the latent tendency of doubt (vicikicchānusaya) unabandoned there?
Yes.
Or rather, where the latent tendency of doubt is unabandoned, is the latent tendency of sensual lust unabandoned there?
In painful feeling (dukkhā vedanā), in the form element, and in the formless element: here the latent tendency of doubt is unabandoned, but the latent tendency of sensual lust should not be said to be either abandoned or unabandoned. In the sense-desire element, in the two feelings: here both the latent tendency of doubt is unabandoned and the latent tendency of sensual lust is unabandoned.
Where the latent tendency of sensual lust is unabandoned, is the latent tendency of lust for existence (bhavarāgānusaya) unabandoned there?
It should not be said to be either abandoned or unabandoned.
Or rather, where the latent tendency of lust for existence is unabandoned, is the latent tendency of sensual lust unabandoned there?
It should not be said to be either abandoned or unabandoned.
Where the latent tendency of sensual lust is unabandoned, is the latent tendency of ignorance (avijjānusaya) unabandoned there?
Yes.
Or rather, where the latent tendency of ignorance is unabandoned, is the latent tendency of sensual lust unabandoned there?
In painful feeling, in the form element, and in the formless element: here the latent tendency of ignorance is unabandoned, but the latent tendency of sensual lust should not be said to be either abandoned or unabandoned. In the sense-desire element, in the two feelings: here both the latent tendency of ignorance is unabandoned and the latent tendency of sensual lust is unabandoned.
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.